Cc. Tudge et al., Preliminary phylogenetic analysis of generic relationships within the Callianassidae and Ctenochelidae (Decapoda : Thalassinidea : Callianassoidea), J CRUS BIOL, 20(2), 2000, pp. 129-149
A phylogenetic analysis of 106 representatives in the thalassinidean famili
es Ctenochelidae and Callianassidae, based on 93 adult morphological charac
ters, was performed to investigate the interrelationships between the 25 cu
rrently recognized genera. The callianideid, Callianidea typa H. Milne Edwa
rds, was used as the out-group. The two in-group families, Ctenochelidae an
d Callianassidae. were both shown to be monophyletic. Monophyly of the four
ctenochelid subfamilies (Anacalliacinae, Callianopsinae, Ctenochelinae, an
d the recently suggested Gourretinae) was not supported. Three callianassid
subfamilies (Callianassinae, Cheraminae, and Eucalliacinae) were found to
be monophyletic but with species compositions different from those presentl
y understood. The fourth callianassid subfamily (Callichirinae) is paraphyl
etic and ancestral to the other subfamilies. Several species described as s
pecies of Callianassa s.l. were found to belong to other genera, Recent dia
gnosis of several small genera from the Americas and Japan has left larger
traditional genera such as Callianassa s.l, and Cheramus paraphyletic. Glyp
turus is apparently paraphyletic as presently diagnosed. The taxonomic posi
tion of some species remains enigmatic largely because of missing data. A l
isting of all valid genera and species of Ctenochelidae and Callianassidae
at the time of publication is provided.