Determination of the Li ion chemical diffusion coefficient for the topotactic solid-state reactions occurring via a two-phase or single-phase solid solution pathway
Md. Levi et al., Determination of the Li ion chemical diffusion coefficient for the topotactic solid-state reactions occurring via a two-phase or single-phase solid solution pathway, J ELEC CHEM, 477(1), 1999, pp. 32-40
We studied the electroanalytical behavior of LixNiO2 and LixCo0.2Ni0.8O2 el
ectrodes using three electroanalytical tools, namely, slow scan cyclic volt
ammetry (SSCV), potentiostatic intermittent titration (PITT), and galvanost
atic intermittent titration (GITT). Based on previous studies of these elec
trodes by in situ XRD, it appears that the Li-insertion mechanisms into the
se electrodes are different in the 3.65 to 4.05 V (Li \ Li+) potential rang
e. In the case of LixNiO2, Li intercalation in this range involves phase tr
ansitions, while Li insertion into LixCo0.2Ni0.8O2 in this potential range
proceeds via the formation of a solid solution. Using the above electroanal
ytical tools, we calculated the diffusion coefficient of Li ions (D) and th
e incremental capacity (C-int) versus electrode potential. It was interesti
ng to observe typical differences in the behavior of C-int and D versus E o
f these electrodes, which reflect the difference of Li insertion mechanisms
. It is assumed that the behavior observed around 3.75-3.95 V (Li/Li+) for
both electrodes reflects repulsive interaction amongst intercalation sites.
However, for LixNiO2, short-range interactions are assumed to be dominant,
leading to peak-shaped behavior of both C-int and D versus E, whereas in t
he case of LixCo0.2Ni0.8O2 electrodes, long-range repulsive interactions do
minate, leading to plain-shaped C-int and D versus E curves. In the potenti
al range 3.50 to 3.64 V (Li/Li+), Li de-intercalation from both electrodes
behaves similarly because it relates to changes in the homogeneous hexagona
l phase (H-1). (C) 1999 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.