If several items are associated with a common cue, the cued recall of
an item is often supposed to decrease as a function of the increase in
strength of its competitors' associations with the cue. Evidence for
such a list-strength effect has been found in prior research, but this
effect could have been caused both by the strength manipulations and
by retrieval-based suppression, because the strengthening and the outp
ut order of the items were confounded. The experiment reported here em
ployed categorizable item lists; some categories in each List containe
d strong items only, some contained weak items only, and some containe
d both strong and weak items. Strengthening was accomplished by varyin
g the exposure time of the items. The testing sequence of the items fr
om each category was controlled by the use of category-plus-first-lett
er cues. When the typical confounding of strengthening and output orde
r was mimicked, list-strength effects were found, which is consistent
with prior research. However, when this confounding was eliminated, th
e list-strength effects disappeared: The recall of neither strong nor
weak items varied with the strengths of the other category exemplars.
This pattern of results indicates that the list-strength effect is not
the result of strength-dependent competition, but is caused by output
-order biases and a process of suppression.