The relationship between developmental stability and morphological asymmetr
y is derived under the standard view that structures on each side of an ind
ividual develop independently and are normally distributed. I use developme
ntal variance of sizes of parts, V-D, as the converse of developmental stab
ility, and assume that V-D follows a gamma distribution. Repeatability of a
symmetry, a measure of how informative asymmetry is about V-D, is quite ins
ensitive to the variance in V-D, for example only reaching 20% when the coe
fficient of variation of V-D is 100%. The coefficient of variation of asymm
etry, CVFA, also increases very slowly with increasing population variation
in V-D. CVFA values from empirical data are sometimes over 100%, implying
that developmental stability is sometimes more variable than any previously
studied type of trait. This result suggests that alternatives to this mode
l may be needed.