Object. The goal of this study was to examine the potential use of ophthalm
odynamometry in the noninvasive assessment of intracranial pressure (ICP).
Under normal conditions, pressure within the central retinal vein is equal
to or greater than ICP, because the central retinal vein passes through the
optic nerve before it drains into the cavernous sinus. The optic nerve she
ath is the place where ICP affects retinal venous pressure. Suction ophthal
modynamometry is an established method of investigation in ophthalmology to
determine the pressure of the central retinal artery. Although observation
s of papilledema and lack of venous pulsations are commonly used to provide
a vague assessment of ICP, ophthalmodynamometry may be used to determine t
he pressure of the central retinal vein. This venous pressure has never bee
n compared with ICP.
Methods. In this study the pressure of the central retinal vein was recorde
d in 22 patients who underwent continuous simultaneous registration of ICP
for various reasons, mainly for suspected hydrocephalus. A comparison of th
e two pressures was made. The results indicated a highly significant linear
correlation between central retinal vein pressure and ICP. These results a
re of great practical value because up-to-date reliable ICP monitoring has
only been possible by using invasive means, by placing a probe extradurally
or subdurally into the brain parenchyma or a ventricle.
Conclusions. Ophthalmodynamometry can be relevant for momentary assessment
and is not suitable for continuous monitoring. However, this technique can
easily be repeated and may be used whenever increased ICP is suspected in a
patient suffering from hydrocephalus, brain tumors, or head injury.