In vitro dentin demineralization inhibition effects of an experimental fluoridated HEMA and water wetting agent

Citation
A. Segura et al., In vitro dentin demineralization inhibition effects of an experimental fluoridated HEMA and water wetting agent, J ORAL REH, 27(6), 2000, pp. 532-537
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION
ISSN journal
0305182X → ACNP
Volume
27
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
532 - 537
Database
ISI
SICI code
0305-182X(200006)27:6<532:IVDDIE>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
The ability of fluoride-releasing resins to inhibit dentin demineralization remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the carie s inhibition of resin composite restorations with an experimental fluoridat ed hydroxyethyl methyl methacrylate (HEMA) and water wetting agent. Standar dized Class V preparations were placed in 40 molars, the gingival margin pl aced below the cementoenamel junction. Two dentin primers (sodium fluoride, HEMA and water; HEMA and water) were placed in equal numbers of 20 prepara tions, then One-Step(R) Dental Adhesive (Bisco) was applied as recommended by the manufacturer, followed by the placement of a resin composite restora tion. Amalgam restorations with no primer/adhesive were placed in 10 prepar ations and 10 preparations were restored by placing One-Step(R) Dental Adhe sive, then resin composite. All teeth were subjected to an artificial carie s challenge (pH 4.4) for 5 days. Results demonstrated the mean areas (mu m( 2) +/- s.d.) of demineralization 100 mu m from the restoration/dentin margi n to be: amalgam 5570 +/- 873; One-Step(R) 7038 +/- 2099; HEMA and water 61 26 +/- 634; fluoridated HEMA and water 3411 +/- 593. ANOVA and Duncan's tes t (P < 0.05) demonstrated the fluoridated BEMA and water wetting agent to h ave significantly less adjacent dentin demineralization than the other thre e groups. Eighty percent of HEMA and water wetting agent, 80% of One-Step(R ) Dental Adhesive and 100% of amalgam restorations demonstrated wall lesion s. One hundred percent of restorations with fluoridated HEMA and water wett ing agent demonstrated inhibition zones in adjacent dentin.