Research involving clinical samples has demonstrated the utility of a 28-it
em personality disorder (PD) screening measure (Inventory of Interpersonal
Problems-Personality Disorder scale [IIP-PD]) culled from the IIP in the pr
ediction of the presence or absence of a PD (Pilkonis, Kim, Proietti, & Bar
kham, 1996). This article extends these diagnostic efficiency findings to n
onclinical samples and presents additional data regarding the factor struct
ure of the 28 IIP-PD items. Diagnostic efficiency statistics for the IIP-PD
scale, calculated using both interview and self-report methods, support th
e utility of the IIP-PD scale as a screening tool for the presence or absen
ce of a PD. High specificity estimates indicate that individuals who do not
exceed Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; Ame
rican Psychiatric Association, 1994) symptom thresholds rarely exceed the I
IP-PD cutoff. Furthermore, a high negative predictive power (NPP) estimate
derived using an interview-based diagnostic standard suggests that the IIP-
PD scale accurately screens out individuals who do not have a PD. Finally,
cross-validated confirmatory factor-analytic results involving items compos
ing the 5 IIP PD subscales identified in previous research (Kim, Pilkonis,
& Barkham, 1997) suggest that a measurement model with a single second-orde
r factor (general PD) and 5 first-order factors (one representing each PD s
ubscale) provided the best fit to the observed data compared to 2 other com
peting models.