This paper reports the results of a telephone survey of state-level officia
ls as to the influence of evaluations of three state welfare innovations: C
alifornia's GAIN, New York's CAP and Florida's Project Independence. The th
ree experiments were known to those interviewed, yet they did Mot have dram
atic, decisive effects on policymaking. However, GAIN and CAP appear to hav
e influenced policymaking in less dramatic and move subtle respects. Much m
ove important than empirical findings about the effects of rested programs
was information about how these programs actually operated in the field alo
ng with evidence that the policies tested in welfare-to-work experiments we
ve logically consistent (that is, there was no obvious reason to think that
they would be unsuccessful), could clear federal waivers, and would not en
counter major political resistance. (C) 2000 by the Association for Public
Policy Analysis and Management.