Fixation of proximal humeral prostheses and rotational micromotion

Citation
Te. Harris et al., Fixation of proximal humeral prostheses and rotational micromotion, J SHOUL ELB, 9(3), 2000, pp. 205-210
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY
ISSN journal
10582746 → ACNP
Volume
9
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
205 - 210
Database
ISI
SICI code
1058-2746(200005/06)9:3<205:FOPHPA>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Twenty pairs of cadaveric humeri were used to compare the rotational stabil ity of proximal humeral prostheses fixed by proximal cementation with the s tability offered by press fit or full cementation. For each proximally ceme nted specimen, only the upper portion of the prosthesis was coated with cem ent. For the Fully cemented specimens, a cement restrictor was used just di stal to the prosthesis, and a finger-packing technique was used to fill the proximal humeral medullary canal. Torque was applied to the Morse taper of the prostheses, and rotational micromotion was measured at the level of th e osteotomy. In each of 11 pairs of cadaveric humeri, one side was press fi t and the contralateral side was proximally cemented; in each of 9 pairs, p roximal cementation was compared with full cementation. Proximally cemented prostheses' micromotion was significantly less than that of press-fit pros theses (P =.0016). There was no difference in micromotion between proximal cementation and full cementation (P =.82). Proximal cementation increased i nitial fixation over press fit. Full cementation did not increase rotationa l stability.