Heinberg and Thompson (1995) demonstrated that females exposed to a compila
tion of media images (commercials) reflecting the current societally sancti
oned standards of thinness and attractiveness experienced greater mood and
body image disturbance than females who viewed a neutral, nonappearance-rel
ated control video. Social comparison has been offered as one mechanism for
the negative outcomes of such media-based exposures. In the current study,
social comparison was manipulated by creating three instructional conditio
ns: comparison, distraction, and neutral. Instructional set did not differe
ntially affect recall of appearance or nonappearance aspects of either an a
ppearance-related collection of commercials or a nonappearance video (e.g.,
Heinberg & Thompson, 1995). However, participants in the comparison condit
ion self-reported a greater degree of self-to-model comparison than partici
pants in the distraction or neutral conditions. A marginally significant th
ree-way interaction between condition, tape, and time emerged for a measure
of appearance dissatisfaction, suggesting that comparison participants' bo
dy images were more negatively affected than the other groups. Tape by Time
interactions also emerged for measures of anger, anxiety, and depression,
revealing that greater distress was associated with the viewing of media im
ages reflecting the current societal bias towards thinness and attractivene
ss. Dispositional level of internalization of societal values regarding att
ractiveness moderated women's reactions to the two video presentations. The
findings are discussed with regard to sociocultural models of body image a
nd possible implications for interventions for appearance-related distress.