Bayesian methods furnish an attractive approach to inference in generalized
linear mixed models. In the absence of subjective prior information for th
e random-effect variance components, these analyses are typically conducted
using either the standard invariant prior for normal responses or diffuse
conjugate priors. Previous work has pointed out serious difficulties with b
oth strategies, and we show here that as in normal mixed models, the standa
rd invariant prior leads to an improper posterior distribution for generali
zed linear mixed models. This article proposes and investigates two alterna
tive reference (i.e., "objective" or "noninformative") priors: an approxima
te uniform shrinkage prior and an approximate jeffreys's prior. We give con
ditions for the existence of the posterior distribution under any prior for
the variance components in conjunction with a uniform prior for the fixed
effects. The approximate uniform shrinkage prior is shown to satisfy these
conditions for several families of distributions, in some cases under mild
constraints on the data. Simulation studies conducted using a legit-normal
model reveal that the approximate uniform shrinkage prior improves substant
ially on a plug-in empirical Bayes rule and fully Bayesian methods using di
ffuse conjugate specifications. The methodology is illustrated on a seizure
dataset.