Comparing different methods of assessing body composition in end-stage renal failure

Citation
Ba. Cooper et al., Comparing different methods of assessing body composition in end-stage renal failure, KIDNEY INT, 58(1), 2000, pp. 408-416
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology","da verificare
Journal title
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
ISSN journal
00852538 → ACNP
Volume
58
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
408 - 416
Database
ISI
SICI code
0085-2538(200007)58:1<408:CDMOAB>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Background. Accurate measurement of nutritional status in patients with end -stage renal disease is important because of its clear association with pro gnosis. Total body water (TBW) has additionally been recently recognized as an independent prognostic value because of its relationship with hypertens ion and cardiac morbidity. The current study was designed to assess the uti lity of surrogate markers of nutritional state and TBW in patients with end -stage renal disease. Methods. Fifty-four patients with renal disease were studied. TBW obtained using the deuterium dilution technique was compared with estimates derived from anthropometric measures of TBW, including 58% body weight, Watson equa tions, and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Anthropometrically deriv ed fat-free mass (FFM) was compared with BIA-derived estimates. Total body nitrogen (TBN) measurements were correlated with TBW estimates and BIA-deri ved resistance. Results. TBW was significantly underestimated by the Watson equation (mean difference, -1.751 L, P = 0.01) and the 58% body weight approximation signi ficantly overestimated it (mean difference, 1.792 L, P = 0.04). The Kushner BIA estimation of TBW did not significantly differ from that of the gold s tandard determined from D2O dilution (mean difference, -1.221 L, P = 0.12) and was also the method that showed the best agreement with the D2O estimat e. However, the limits of agreement were large. Accurate prediction equatio ns for FFM (FFM = -21.768 + 0.001 x ht(2) + 6630.669 x 1/R + 0.312 x wt, R- 2 = 0.95) and TBN (TBN = -668.324 - 3.963 x age + 10.133 x wt + 0.035 x ht( 2) + 32141.457 x 1/R, R-2 = 0.91) were derived from BIA obtained resistance . Conclusions. The estimation of TBW varies significantly depending on the me thod of calculation. BIA is the most accurate surrogate marker for the meas urement of both TBW and other parameters of body composition.