Examination of butadiene/styrene-co-butadiene rubber blends by tapping mode atomic force microscopy. Importance of the indentation depth and reduced tip-sample energy dissipation in tapping mode atomic force microscopy studyof elastomers

Citation
G. Bar et al., Examination of butadiene/styrene-co-butadiene rubber blends by tapping mode atomic force microscopy. Importance of the indentation depth and reduced tip-sample energy dissipation in tapping mode atomic force microscopy studyof elastomers, LANGMUIR, 16(13), 2000, pp. 5702-5711
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Physical Chemistry/Chemical Physics
Journal title
LANGMUIR
ISSN journal
07437463 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
13
Year of publication
2000
Pages
5702 - 5711
Database
ISI
SICI code
0743-7463(20000627)16:13<5702:EOBRBB>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Tapping mode atomic force microscopy (TMAFM) measurements were performed fo r blends of two elastomers, cis-1,4-butadiene rubber (BR) and styrene-co-bu tadiene rubber (SBR) containing silica filler particles. To help interpret the TMAFM phase and height images of the BR/SBR blends, transmission electr on microscopy (TEM) measurements were carried out for the BR/SBR blends, an d dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) as well as frequency-sweep/force-probe TMAFM measurements were carried out for BR and SBR homopolymers. TEM images show that silica filler particles of BR/SBR blends are present mainly in t he SBR component, and DMA results reveal that BR has a lower glass transiti on temperature than does SBR. In the phase images of BR/SBR blends the less stiff component BR is brighter than is the stiffer component SBR. For the rational interpretation of TMAFM phase images of viscoelastic materials, it is crucial to consider the indentation depth of the tip into samples as we ll as the reduced tip-sample energy dissipation, not the total tip-sample e nergy dissipation. At a given set-point ratio the indentation depth is smal ler on the stiffer component SBR than on the less stiff component BR, but a t a given indentation depth the phase shift is larger on the stiffer compon ent SBR. The phase shift increases almost linearly with increasing the redu ced tip-sample energy dissipation. The reduced tip-sample sample energy dis sipation is larger for SBR than for BR in agreement with DMA results.