Assessment in the diagnosis of male chronic genital tract infection

Citation
Je. Santoianni et al., Assessment in the diagnosis of male chronic genital tract infection, MEDICINA, 60(3), 2000, pp. 331-334
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
MEDICINA-BUENOS AIRES
ISSN journal
00257680 → ACNP
Volume
60
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
331 - 334
Database
ISI
SICI code
0025-7680(2000)60:3<331:AITDOM>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Different methodologies have been proposed to interpret the microbiological findings associated with contaminating, indigenous microbiota of the anter ior urethra. In order to solve the controversy related to the diagnosis of chronic seminal infections in asymptomatic young adults, the results applyi ng Stamey and Meares' criteria were compared with those obtained when semen cultures were studied for significant bacteriospermia. A total of 218 cons ecutive asymptomatic male partners of infertile couples were evaluated by t he four-specimen technique described by Stamey and Meares' with the additio n of semen (SM). infection was detected in 46% by SM, while semen cultures (SC) showed a prevalence of infection of 41%; 73 patients were positive by both criteria and 102 negative; 27 patients were positive by SM technique i n prostate fluid while their semen cultures were negative; 16 patients had positive semen cultures and were considered negative by SM. The kappa stati stic indicated a good degree of agreement between both methodologies (kappa = 0.61, z = 8.68, p < 0.001). The estimated risk of being considered negat ive attributable to the semen culture (27 patients) was 25% (attributable r isk = y(SC). = 0.2550), and of being considered positive attributable to th e semen culture (16 patients) was 26% (y(SC+) = 0.2579). The 95% confidence limits were estimated in 12 to 39%, and in 13 to 31%, respectively. In vie w of these results, to establish the diagnosis of chronic prostatitis, the addition of prostatic fluid or voided urine cultures after prostatic massag e, must be performed. Semen culture confronted with first-voided urine avoi d overestimating seminal infection.