Far too many collective agreements continue to be cluttered with archa
ic, cumbersome language better suited to the distant past. Perhaps tha
t's the way it has always been done-but the author argues it is time f
or a change to plain language. The article charts the language pitfall
s that await the unwary drafter of a collective agreement-or any agree
ment or document, actually-and shows how to sidestep them through the
adoption of some simple rules.