COMMUNICATING WITH AND TREATING CANCER-PATIENTS - HOW DOES THE USE OFNON-PROVEN THERAPIES AND PATIENTS FEELING OF MENTAL DISTRESS INFLUENCE THE INTERACTION BETWEEN THE PATIENT AND THE HOSPITAL STAFF
T. Risberg et al., COMMUNICATING WITH AND TREATING CANCER-PATIENTS - HOW DOES THE USE OFNON-PROVEN THERAPIES AND PATIENTS FEELING OF MENTAL DISTRESS INFLUENCE THE INTERACTION BETWEEN THE PATIENT AND THE HOSPITAL STAFF, European journal of cancer, 33(6), 1997, pp. 883-890
A questionnaire-based study was carried out at the Department of Oncol
ogy, University Hospital of Tromso, during the period July 1990-Octobe
r 1991. The 252 participating patients received a questionnaire at arr
ival at the oncology unit and the surviving patients a follow-up quest
ionnaire at home 4 months later. The aim of the study was to assess wh
ether patients' attitudes to information about their malignant disease
and satisfaction with the given treatment correlated to their use of
non-proven therapies (NPTs) and reported mental distress. Patients und
er 45 years of age significantly more often preferred comprehensive me
dical information than older patients (83% versus 52%, P = 0.001). Bet
ter educated patients were more satisfied with the information given b
y their general practitioner (GP) (P = 0.05) and at their local hospit
al (P = 0.02) than other patients. Of all responders, 81% of the patie
nts treated in the department were completely satisfied with the oppor
tunities to ask questions while 87% reported being given comprehensive
information. Only 2% of the patients reported to have received unwant
ed information. Better educated patients expressed less satisfaction w
ith the information given and the possibility of influencing their own
treatment at the Department of Oncology (P = 0.02). Patients expressi
ng mental distress wanted less information (P = 0.05) and expressed le
ss satisfaction with the quality of the perceived information in the o
ncology unit (P = 0.004). They were also less satisfied with the treat
ment given (P = 0.05) and their own influence on the treatment decisio
n (P = 0.02). Users of NPT did not feel the received treatment to be t
he best possible (P = 0.04). (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.