Se. Mccallum et al., Mecamylamine prevents tolerance but enhances whole brain [H-3]epibatidine binding in response to repeated nicotine administration in rats, PSYCHOPHAR, 150(1), 2000, pp. 1-8
Rationale: Chronic administration of nicotine in rats results in upregulati
on of neuronal nicotinic receptors. Upregulation has been proposed to refle
ct receptor desensitization, which may underlie functional tolerance to nic
otine's effects. However, evidence indicates that tolerance and upregulatio
n do not always parallel each other, suggesting that either upregulation do
es not always reflect desensitization, or mechanisms other than receptor de
sensitization account for tolerance to nicotine.
Objectives: The present studies examined tolerance to nicotine-induced anti
nociception and changes in receptor binding after two regimens of intermitt
ent nicotine injections in rats. The role of receptor activation in upregul
ation and tolerance was also examined by co-administering nicotine with the
non-competitive antagonist, mecamylamine. Methods: Sprague-Dawley rats wer
e administered a short (once-daily, SC for 6 days (0.35 mg/kg)) or long (tw
ice-daily for II days (0.66 mg/kg)) series of injections and tolerance to n
icotine-induced antinociception and [H-3]epibatidine binding in whole brain
were measured. Results: The short series of injections resulted in toleran
ce to nicotine-induced antinociception, but failed to increase [H-3]epibati
dine binding. In contrast, the long series of injections resulted in both t
olerance and increased receptor binding. Once-daily pairings of; mecamylami
ne (1 mg/kg, SC) with nicotine (0.35 mg/kg) for 6 days blocked the developm
ent of tolerance, indicating receptor activation is necessary for tolerance
to occur. Pairing mecamylamine with nicotine (0.66 mg/kg) twice daily for
11 days blocked tolerance but produced a greater increase in [H-3]epibatidi
ne binding than nicotine alone. Conclusions: A dissociation of tolerance fr
om receptor upregulation was observed in the present study. The finding tha
t receptor activation may be necessary for tolerance but not upregulation i
s discussed within the context of possible mechanisms controlling tolerance
to nicotine.