PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the role of magnetic resonance (MR) urog
raphy in the radiologic assessment of patients with spinal dysraphism.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with spinal dysraphism were referr
ed for MR urography with half-fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enh
ancement (RARE) (repetition time msec/echo time msec = 11.9/95) and RARE (2
,800/1,100) sequences on a 1.5-T MR machine. Six patients did not tolerate
MR urography owing to claustrophobia (n = 4) or flexion deformities (n = 2)
, giving a final success rate of 57% (eight patients). Two patients had a s
ingle kidney tone after nephrectomy, one with a crossed-fused ectopic kidne
y). Images were jointly assessed by two radiologists and compared with excr
etory urographic studies. The signal intensity ratio and contrast-to-noise
ratio were also calculated.
RESULTS: Visualization of the kidneys, pelvicaliceal system, and ureters wa
s better with half-fourier RARE than with RARE imaging, whereas visualizati
on of the bladder was comparable with both sequences. The mean signal inten
sity ratios for half-Fourier RARE and RARE sequences, respectively, were 16
.2 +/- 3.65 and 19.2 +/- 3.65 (P =.58, factorial analysis of variance model
), whereas the mean contrast-to-noise ratios were 55.4 +/- 5.16 and 47.8 +/
- 5.16 (P =.34). Cortical scarring was depicted more clearly at MR urograph
y than at excretory urography, whereas a renal calculus seen at excretory u
rography was not detected at MR urography.
CONCLUSION: MR urography was feasible in 57% of patients with spinal dysrap
hism and is a safe, accurate method of evaluating the upper urinary tract.