The purpose of this article is to clarify some of the areas considered most
problematic in Mircea Eliade's approach to religion. One of its principal
goals is to show that Eliade's method is primarily phenomenological rather
than theological, as some interpreters of his work maintain. In presenting
this phenomenological interpretation of Eliade four areas of his approach a
re addressed: (1) the extent to which it incorporates historical method; (2
) the meaning of religion as sui generis and irreducible; (3) Eliade's use
of the term 'sacred'; and (4) Eliade's hierarchalizing of religious phenome
na. Eliade's departure from phenomenology to explain the causes of religiou
s experience is also addressed.