The effect of autonomic nervous system activity on exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise: evaluation by heart rate variability

Citation
B. Eryonucu et al., The effect of autonomic nervous system activity on exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise: evaluation by heart rate variability, ACT CARDIOL, 55(3), 2000, pp. 181-185
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
ACTA CARDIOLOGICA
ISSN journal
00015385 → ACNP
Volume
55
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
181 - 185
Database
ISI
SICI code
0001-5385(200006)55:3<181:TEOANS>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Objective - We investigated the effect of autonomic nervous system activity on exaggerated systolic blood pressure (SBP) response to exercise in healt hy subjects using heart rate variability (HRV) analysis. Method and results - We studied 53 healthy volunteer subjects with exercise treadmill test according to the Bruce protocol. Time domain and frequency domain of HRV were measured for each 5-minute segment before (rest) and aft er exercise (recovery) and during the total exercise period. The mean chang e in SBP (Delta SBP) was 39 +/- 18 mm Hg. The Delta SBP above the value of mean (greater than or equal to 40 mm Hg) was defined as an exaggerated Delt a SBP. According to the Delta SBP, subjects were classified into two groups . Group I consisted of 32 patients who showed a normal Delta SBP, group II consisted of 21 patients who showed exaggerated Delta SBP. There were no si gnificant differences in baseline clinical characteristics and exercise dur ation between the two groups, There were no significant differences in the mean RR intervals, SDNN (standard deviation of all RR intervals), RMSSD (th e square root of the mean of the sum of the squares of differences between adjacent RR intervals), and HF (high-frequency power, 0.15 to 0.40 Hz) at r est between the two groups. However, LF (low-frequency power, 0.04 to 0.15 Hz) and LF/HF ratio at rest were significantly higher at rest in group II t han in group I. There were no significant differences in the mean RR interv als and HF at exercise between the groups. However, SDNN and RMSSD were sig nificantly lower, LF and the LF/HF ratio were significantly higher at exerc ise in group II than in group I. No differences in these parameters were ob served at recovery between the two groups, Conclusions - The sympathetic activity was higher at rest and during the to tal exercise period, parasympathetic activity was lower during the total ex ercise period in healthy subjects with exaggerated SBP response to exercise than in those with normal SBP response.