Background: Serodiagnosis of anisakiosis and Anisakis allergy is difficult
since many Anisakis antigens show cross-reactivity complications. In the pr
esent study, we assess the usefulness of the major immunologic methods curr
ently available for the diagnosis of Anisakis allergy.
Methods: Four tests (skin prick test, CAP-FEIA system, Western blotting, an
d an antigen-capture ELISA using O-deglycosylated antigen bound by the mono
clonal antibody UA3) were applied to Anisakis-free subjects and subjects wi
th confirmed Anisakis allergy.
Results: The skin prick test, CAP-FEIA, and the antigen-capture ELISA ident
ified Anisakis allergy sera with 100% sensitivity, while Western blotting s
howed 96% sensitivity. The antigen-capture ELISA also showed 100% specifici
ty, but CAP-FEIA showed a specificity of only 50%. In Western blotting, non
e of the bands detected were specific for either Anisakis-free or Anisakis
allergy subjects. The skin prick test was not applied to the Anisakis-free
subjects, so its specificity could not be determined.
Conclusions: On the basis of these results, we suggest that the most approp
riate procedure for diagnosis of Anisakis allergy suspected on clinical gro
unds is the antigen-capture ELISA using UA3, or, alternatively, a prelimina
ry skin prick test with a positive result subsequently confirmed by UA3-ELI
SA.