The epidemiology of labor induction: Arizona, 1997

Citation
Dv. Coonrod et al., The epidemiology of labor induction: Arizona, 1997, AM J OBST G, 182(6), 2000, pp. 1355-1360
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
ISSN journal
00029378 → ACNP
Volume
182
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1355 - 1360
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9378(200006)182:6<1355:TEOLIA>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to describe labor induction risk facto rs and consequences among women with term singleton gestations with vertex presentation. STUDY DESIGN: Arizona births in 1997 (N = 65,607) were studied by means of stratified analysis and logistic regression, RESULTS: Labor induction occurred in 20.3% (n = 13,288). Labor induction ri sk factors were as follows: race or ethnicity (white non-Hispanic 25.3%; Hi spanic, 13.9%; foreign-born Hispanic, 10.3%; and US-born Hispanic, 18.5%), education (<12 years, 14.1%; >12 years, 24.6%), payor (private insurance, 2 4.5%; Medicaid, 16.7%), hospital type (government controlled, 13.7%; invest or owned, 30.5%). Race or ethnicity and hospital type remained important de terminants of labor induction in the multivariate analysis. Relative risks of cesarean delivery with labor induction were as follows: nulliparous, 1.3 8; parous with no previous cesarean delivery, 1.00; and parous with previou s cesarean delivery, 0.50. CONCLUSION: Large variations in labor induction were noted across maternal ethnicity and hospital type categories. Labor induction increased cesarean delivery rates among nulliparous women, whereas no increase was seen among parous women with no previous cesarean delivery. Labor induction was used l ess often among those with previous cesarean delivery; when it was used in this group, however, it was associated with a lower cesarean delivery rate.