Ef. Magann et al., Determination of amniotic fluid volume in twin pregnancies: Ultrasonographic evaluation versus operator estimation, AM J OBST G, 182(6), 2000, pp. 1606-1609
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the accuracy of amniotic fluid volume est
imation (visually) in diamniotic twin pregnancy versus ultrasonography tech
niques.
STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective study the volume of each sac in 23 sets o
f diamniotic twin pregnancies was subjectively and objectively estimated by
a second-year obstetric resident, nurse sonographer, maternal-fetal medici
ne fellow, and maternal-fetal medicine staff. The actual volume was confirm
ed by amniocentesis and a dye-dilution technique.
RESULTS: There was no difference in the total number of correct estimates o
f volume by level of operator experience (P = .98), ultrasonography techniq
ue (P = .87), or combined subjective versus objective correct estimates (P
= .87). identification of low volume was not different among the four evalu
ators (P = .48), but the percentage of correct estimates was poor (7%-29%).
The 2-diameter pocket was a better predictor of oligohydramnios (57%) than
the amniotic fluid index or the largest vertical pocket (12.5%; P = .002).
CONCLUSION: The extremes of volume (low or high) are poorly identified by t
he subjective or objective assessment of volume.