Segmental cervical spine movement with the intubating laryngeal mask during manual in-line stabilization in patients with cervical pathology undergoing cervical spine surgery
S. Kihara et al., Segmental cervical spine movement with the intubating laryngeal mask during manual in-line stabilization in patients with cervical pathology undergoing cervical spine surgery, ANESTH ANAL, 91(1), 2000, pp. 195-200
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
We quantified the extent and distribution of segmental cervical movement pr
oduced by the intubating laryngeal mask (ILM) during manual in-line stabili
zation in 20 anesthetized patients with cervical pathology undergoing cervi
cal spine surgery. All patients had neurological symptoms preoperatively. T
he ILM was inserted with the head and neck in the neutral position. Intubat
ion was facilitated by transillumination of the neck with a lightwand. Cerv
ical movement was recorded with single-frame lateral radiographic images ta
ken 1) immediately before induction (baseline); 2) during ILM insertion (in
sertion); 3) when transillumination was first seen at the cricothyroid memb
rane (intubation A); 4) when the tube was being advanced into the trachea (
intubation B); and 5) during ILM removal (removal). Radiographic images wer
e digitized and the degree of flexion/extension and posterior movement meas
ured for the occiput (CO) through to C5. During ILM insertion, C0-5 were fl
exed by an average of 1-1.6 degrees (all P < 0.05). During intubation A/B,
CO-4 were flexed by an average of 1.4-3.0 degrees (all P < 0.01), but C5 wa
s unchanged. During ILM removal, C0-3 were flexed by an average of 1 degree
(all: P < 0.05), but C3-5 were unchanged. During insertion and intubation
A/B, C2-5 were displaced posteriorly by an average of 0.5-1.0 mm (all: P <
0.05). During removal, there was no change at C1-5. Neurological symptoms I
mproved in all patients. We conclude that the ILM produces segmental moveme
nt of the cervical spine despite manual in-line stabilization in patients w
ith cervical spine pathology undergoing cervical spine surgery. This motion
is in the opposite direction to direct laryngoscopy, suggesting that diffe
rent approaches to airway management may be more appropriate depending on t
he nature of the cervical instability.