Background. Barrett's ulcer, which develops within Barrett's esophagus, is
frequently responsible far bleeding. Perforation is a rare complication con
stituting a great challenge for diagnosis and management.
Methods. Three personal cases and 31 published reports of perforated Barret
t's ulcer were reviewed retrospectively. The site of perforation, clinical
presentation, management, and outcome were assessed.
Results. The clinical presentation proved to be heterogeneous and was deter
mined by the site of perforation: this was the pleural cavity (20% of cases
), mediastinum (20%), left atrium (16.6%), tracheobronchial tract (13.3%),
aorta (13.3%), pericardium (10%), or pulmonary vein (6.6%). Early esophagec
tomy and esaphageal diversion-exclusion were the most frequent procedures,
and overall mortality was 45%.
Conclusions. The poor prognosis of perforated Barrett's ulcer should be imp
roved by earlier diagnosis and adequate emergent operation. Although early
esophagectomy constitutes the recommended procedure, esophageal diversion-e
xclusion, which allows control of both sepsis and bleeding, is also of inte
rest. (C) 2000 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.