Over the past few years there has been growing interest in considering Fact
ors defined at multiple levels in public health research. Multilevel analys
is has emerged as one analytical strategy that may partly address this need
, by allowing the simultaneous examination of group-level and individual-le
vel factors. This paper reviews the rationale for using multilevel analysis
in public health research, summarizes the statistical methodology, and hig
hlights some of the research questions that have been addressed using these
methods. The advantages and disadvantages of multilevel analysis compared
with standard methods are reviewed. The use of multilevel analysis raises t
heoretical and methodological issues related to the theoretical model being
tested, the conceptual distinction between group- and individual-level var
iables, the ability to differentiate "independent" effects, the reciprocal
relationships between factors at different levels, and the increased comple
xity that these models imply. The potentialities and limitations of multile
vel analysis, within the broader context of understanding the role of facto
rs defined at multiple levels in shaping health outcomes, are discussed.