1,4-Anthraquinone: an anticancer drug that blocks nucleoside transport, inhibits macromolecule synthesis, induces DNA fragmentation, and decreases the growth and viability of L1210 leukemic cells in the same nanomolar range as daunorubicin in vitro
Em. Perchellet et al., 1,4-Anthraquinone: an anticancer drug that blocks nucleoside transport, inhibits macromolecule synthesis, induces DNA fragmentation, and decreases the growth and viability of L1210 leukemic cells in the same nanomolar range as daunorubicin in vitro, ANTI-CANC D, 11(5), 2000, pp. 339-352
1,4-Anthraquinone (AQ) was synthesized and shown to prevent L1210 leukemic
cells from synthesizing macromolecules and growing in vitro, In contrast, i
ts dihydroxy-9,10-anthraquinone precursor, quinrzarin, was inactive, The an
titumor activity of AQ was compared to that of daunorubicin (DAU), which is
structurally different from AQ but also contains a quinone moiety. AQ is e
qulpotent to DAU against L1210 tumor cell proliferation (IC50: 25 nM at day
2 and 9 nM at day 4) and viability (IC50: 100 nM at day 2 and 25 nM at day
4), suggesting that its cytostatic and cytotoxic activities are a combinat
ion of drug concentration and duration of drug exposure. Since AQ does not
increase but rather decreases the mitotic index of L1210 cells at 24 h, it
is not an antitubulin drug but might arrest early stages of cell cycle prog
ression. Like DAU, a 1.5-3 h pretreatment with AQ is sufficient to inhibit
the rates of DNA, RNA and protein syntheses (IC50: 2 mu M) determined over
30-60 min periods of pulse-labeling in L1210 cells in vitro. In contrast to
DAU, which is inactive, a 15 min pretreatment with AQ has the advantage of
also Inhibiting the cellular transport of both purine and pyrimidine nucle
osides (IC50: 2.5 mu M) over a 30 s period in vitro. Hence, AQ may prevent
the incorporation of [H-3]adenosine and [H-3]thymidine into DNA because it
rapidly blocks the uptake of these nucleosides by the tumor cells. After 24
h, AQ induces as much DNA cleavage as camptothecin and DAU, two anticancer
drugs producing DNA strand breaks and known to, respectively, inhibit topo
isomerase I and II activities. However, the concentration-dependent inducti
on of DNA cleavage by AQ, which peaks at 1.6-4 mu M and disappears at 10-25
mu M, resembles that of DAU. The mechanism by which AQ induces DNA cleavag
e is inhibited by actinomycin D, cycloheximide and aurintricarboxylic acid,
suggesting that AQ activates endonucleases and triggers apoptosis. The abi
lities of AO to block nucleoside transport, inhibit DNA synthesis and induc
e DNA fragmentation are irreversible upon drug removal, suggesting that thi
s compound may rapidly interact with various molecular targets in cell memb
ranes and nuclei to disrupt the functions of nucleoside transporters and nu
cleic acids, and trigger long-lasting antitumor effects which persist after
cessation of drug treatment. Because of its potency and dual effects on nu
cleoside transport and DNA cleavage, the use of bifunctional AQ with antile
ukemic activity in the nM range in vitro might provide a considerable advan
tage in polychemotherapy to potentiate the action of antimetabolites and se
nsitize multidrug-resistant tumor cells. [(C) 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wi
lkins.].