1,4-Anthraquinone: an anticancer drug that blocks nucleoside transport, inhibits macromolecule synthesis, induces DNA fragmentation, and decreases the growth and viability of L1210 leukemic cells in the same nanomolar range as daunorubicin in vitro

Citation
Em. Perchellet et al., 1,4-Anthraquinone: an anticancer drug that blocks nucleoside transport, inhibits macromolecule synthesis, induces DNA fragmentation, and decreases the growth and viability of L1210 leukemic cells in the same nanomolar range as daunorubicin in vitro, ANTI-CANC D, 11(5), 2000, pp. 339-352
Citations number
45
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
ANTI-CANCER DRUGS
ISSN journal
09594973 → ACNP
Volume
11
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
339 - 352
Database
ISI
SICI code
0959-4973(200006)11:5<339:1AADTB>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
1,4-Anthraquinone (AQ) was synthesized and shown to prevent L1210 leukemic cells from synthesizing macromolecules and growing in vitro, In contrast, i ts dihydroxy-9,10-anthraquinone precursor, quinrzarin, was inactive, The an titumor activity of AQ was compared to that of daunorubicin (DAU), which is structurally different from AQ but also contains a quinone moiety. AQ is e qulpotent to DAU against L1210 tumor cell proliferation (IC50: 25 nM at day 2 and 9 nM at day 4) and viability (IC50: 100 nM at day 2 and 25 nM at day 4), suggesting that its cytostatic and cytotoxic activities are a combinat ion of drug concentration and duration of drug exposure. Since AQ does not increase but rather decreases the mitotic index of L1210 cells at 24 h, it is not an antitubulin drug but might arrest early stages of cell cycle prog ression. Like DAU, a 1.5-3 h pretreatment with AQ is sufficient to inhibit the rates of DNA, RNA and protein syntheses (IC50: 2 mu M) determined over 30-60 min periods of pulse-labeling in L1210 cells in vitro. In contrast to DAU, which is inactive, a 15 min pretreatment with AQ has the advantage of also Inhibiting the cellular transport of both purine and pyrimidine nucle osides (IC50: 2.5 mu M) over a 30 s period in vitro. Hence, AQ may prevent the incorporation of [H-3]adenosine and [H-3]thymidine into DNA because it rapidly blocks the uptake of these nucleosides by the tumor cells. After 24 h, AQ induces as much DNA cleavage as camptothecin and DAU, two anticancer drugs producing DNA strand breaks and known to, respectively, inhibit topo isomerase I and II activities. However, the concentration-dependent inducti on of DNA cleavage by AQ, which peaks at 1.6-4 mu M and disappears at 10-25 mu M, resembles that of DAU. The mechanism by which AQ induces DNA cleavag e is inhibited by actinomycin D, cycloheximide and aurintricarboxylic acid, suggesting that AQ activates endonucleases and triggers apoptosis. The abi lities of AO to block nucleoside transport, inhibit DNA synthesis and induc e DNA fragmentation are irreversible upon drug removal, suggesting that thi s compound may rapidly interact with various molecular targets in cell memb ranes and nuclei to disrupt the functions of nucleoside transporters and nu cleic acids, and trigger long-lasting antitumor effects which persist after cessation of drug treatment. Because of its potency and dual effects on nu cleoside transport and DNA cleavage, the use of bifunctional AQ with antile ukemic activity in the nM range in vitro might provide a considerable advan tage in polychemotherapy to potentiate the action of antimetabolites and se nsitize multidrug-resistant tumor cells. [(C) 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wi lkins.].