In this study, we investigated the importance of occasion as a source of er
ror variance in (a) estimates of the dependability (generalizability) of sc
ience assessment scores and (b) the interchangeability of science test form
ats. Two science tests were developed to measure 8th-grade students' knowle
dge of concepts related to electricity and electric circuits: A hands-on as
sessment that provided students with equipment to manipulate and an analogo
us pencil-and-paper version. Students were administered both tests on 2 occ
asions, approximately 1 month apart. Results of the univariate generalizabi
lity results showed that explicitly recognizing occasion as a facet of erro
r variance altered the interpretation about the substantial sources of erro
r in the measurement and gave lower estimates of the dependability of scien
ce scores. Including occasion as an explicit source of variance in the mult
ivariate generalizability analyses influenced the interpretation of the obs
erved correlation between hands-on and pencil-and-paper scores but had litt
le influence on the estimated disattenuated correlation between assessment
methods.