Development of a hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) simulation model 2. The flowering response of two hemp cultivars to photoperiod

Citation
Sn. Lisson et al., Development of a hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) simulation model 2. The flowering response of two hemp cultivars to photoperiod, AUST J EX A, 40(3), 2000, pp. 413-417
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture/Agronomy
Journal title
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE
ISSN journal
08161089 → ACNP
Volume
40
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
413 - 417
Database
ISI
SICI code
0816-1089(2000)40:3<413:DOAH(S>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
The duration from sowing to flowering is an important determinant of fibre yield potential in hemp, since maximum stem yield occurs shortly after flow ering. As a short-day plant, daylength has a key influence on the timing of flowering in hemp. This paper reports on studies into the effect of photop eriod on the thermal time duration from sowing to flowering for 2 hemp cult ivars, and develops parameters to enable simulation of post-emergent phenol ogy in the hemp model described in the final paper of this series. The hemp model divides the post-emergent period into a vegetative phase tha t ends at floral initiation, a flower development phase (FDP) between flowe r initiation and appearance, and a short phase between first flower appeara nce and harvest maturity (male anthesis). The vegetative phase is further d ivided into a temperature-dependent basic vegetative phase (BVP) and a dayl ength-dependent photoperiod induced phase (PIP). For a short-day plant, the duration of PIP is assumed to be zero degree days at daylengths below a ba se or maximum optimum photoperiod (MOP). Daylengths in excess of the MOP le ad to an increase in thermal time within PIP, the duration of which is dete rmined by a genotype's photoperiod sensitivity (PS). Two hemp genotypes, Kompolti and Futura 77, were exposed to 6 different pho toperiod regimes ranging from 8 to 16 h in a growth chamber. Thermal time d urations from emergence to flower initiation and first flower formation (ha rvest) were calculated from thermograph plots. The flowering responses for the 2 cultivars were typical for a short-day pl ant, with flowering occurring rapidly in daylengths less than about 14 h an d with increasing delay at longer photoperiods. With the exception of a lon ger thermal time duration from flower formation to harvest maturity in the case of Kompolti, the 2 cultivars had similar values for the key phenology parameters. Respectively, for Futura and Kompolti: BVP was 383 degrees Cd a nd 390 degrees Cd, MOP was 14 h and 13.8 h, PS was 266 degrees Cd/h and 252 degrees Cd/h, and FDP was 76.8 degrees Cd and 80.2 degrees Cd.