Split cord malformations in myelomeningocele patients

Citation
Bj. Iskandar et al., Split cord malformations in myelomeningocele patients, BR J NEUROS, 14(3), 2000, pp. 200-203
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
ISSN journal
02688697 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
200 - 203
Database
ISI
SICI code
0268-8697(200006)14:3<200:SCMIMP>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Split cord malformations (SCMs) may occur in conjunction with myelomeningoc eles, and are often ignored or misdiagnosed, potentially causing spinal cor d tethering. In this paper, we study the incidence and clinical significanc e of such an association. We have retrospectively reviewed the medical reco rds and radiographs of 20 myelomeningocele patients who had a SCM. These co mprised at least 6% of our myelomeningocele patients. Five of the 20 had si multaneous repair of both lesions at birth. The other 15 were diagnosed wit h the SCM in a delayed fashion (mean age 4.4 years). Clinical presentations that prompted a diagnostic investigation included hypertrichosis (1), pain (2), routine radiographic follow-up (2), neurourological deterioration (10 ) and progressive scoliosis (5). In 17 of the 20 patients, the SCM involved the placode or was within one level of it. Fifteen of these were in the ar ea of the placode or one segment above it. Five of the 20 patients had hype rtrichosis and 15 of the 20 patients had a bony midline septum (i.e. type I SCM). Several accompanying spinal dysraphic lesions also contributed to th e tethering: thickened (previously inconspicuous) filum terminale (6), syri ngohydromyelia (5) and a neurenteric cyst with a benign teratoma (1). Arach noiditis secondary to the prior myelomeningocele repair was found, as expec ted, in all 15 patients. However, in virtually all patients, there was also evidence of tethering at the level of the SCM. Long-term follow-up showed stabilization of preoperative symptoms and signs, whereas complications of the operation and clinical evidence of retethering were uncommon. Myelomeni ngocele patients should be screened with clinical examinations looking for hypertrichosis and with spinal radiographs preoperatively looking for evide nce of SCM (bony midline septum and/or interpedicular widening not due to t he myelomeningocele). Intraoperatively, the placode and the rostral spinal cord segment should be carefully inspected for an SCM and other dysraphic l esions.