A comparison of cerebral hemodynamic parameters between transient monocular blindness patients, transient ischemic attack patients and control subjects
Dr. Rutgers et al., A comparison of cerebral hemodynamic parameters between transient monocular blindness patients, transient ischemic attack patients and control subjects, CEREB DIS, 10(4), 2000, pp. 307-314
Purpose: To assess whether patients with transient monocular blindness (TMB
) and patients with hemispheric transient ischemic attacks (hTIA) differ fr
om each other with respect to cerebral hemodynamic parameters. Methods: Sev
enteen TMB patients and 23 hTIA patients with a moderate to severe stenosis
or an occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) underwent magnetic re
sonance (MR) angiography, H-1 MR spectroscopy and transcranial Doppler sono
graphy. Thirty-one control subjects were investigated to obtain reference v
alues for the MR investigations. Quantitative flow was measured in the ICAs
, the basilar artery and the middle cerebral arteries (MCA). Metabolic chan
ges in the MCA territory were studied by assessing N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA)
/choline ratios and prevalences of lactate. The prevalence of collateral fl
ow was assessed in the circle of Willis and the ophthalmic arteries. The va
somotor reactivity was studied by measuring the CO2 reactivity of the MCA t
erritories. Results: Quantitative flow in the cerebropetal arteries and the
MCAs did not differ between TMB patients and hTIA patients. Also patterns
of collateral flow, prevalence of lactate and CO2 reactivity were similar.
The mean ipsilateral NAA/choline ratio was lower in hTIA patients compared
with TMB patients (p < 0.01), and was predominantly correlated with symptom
atology (p < 0.01), i.e. whether patients had TMB or hTIA, and not with ips
ilateral MCA flow (p = 0.2) or ipsilateral CO2 reactivity (p = 0.7). Conclu
sion: The results of this study indicate that there are no cerebral hemodyn
amic differences between TMB patients and hTIA patients. It is therefore un
likely that hemodynamic factors account for differences in clinical charact
eristics between the two patient groups,
Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.