RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF HIGH NUTRIENT DENSITY FORMULA VERSUS STANDARD FORMULA IN CHRONIC LUNG-DISEASE

Citation
Ms. Fewtrell et al., RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF HIGH NUTRIENT DENSITY FORMULA VERSUS STANDARD FORMULA IN CHRONIC LUNG-DISEASE, Acta paediatrica, 86(6), 1997, pp. 577-582
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics
Journal title
ISSN journal
08035253
Volume
86
Issue
6
Year of publication
1997
Pages
577 - 582
Database
ISI
SICI code
0803-5253(1997)86:6<577:RTOHND>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
To test the hypothesis that the nutrient intake and growth of infants with chronic lung disease would be improved by providing nutrients in more concentrated form, and that the lower volume would improve respir atory status, 60 preterm infants requiring supplemental oxygen at 28 d ays of age were randomly assigned a low-density (24 kcal/oz) formula f ed at 180 ml/kg/day, or a high-density (30 kcal/oz) formula at 145 ml/ kg/day. There was no difference in growth, respiratory outcome, oedema or diuretic requirement between dietary groups. Infants fed the high nutrient density formula had significantly greater total energy (143 v s 134 kcal/kg/day) and protein (3.9 vs 3.6 g/kg/day) intakes, largely because the low-density formula group did not achieve the designated 1 80 ml/kg/day. In conclusion, use of a high-density formula in infants with chronic lung disease did not improve growth or respiratory outcom e, despite a small increase in total energy and protein intake.