Interpretation of the charcoal record in forest soils: forest fires and their production and deposition of macroscopic charcoal

Citation
M. Ohlson et E. Tryterud, Interpretation of the charcoal record in forest soils: forest fires and their production and deposition of macroscopic charcoal, HOLOCENE, 10(4), 2000, pp. 519-525
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
HOLOCENE
ISSN journal
09596836 → ACNP
Volume
10
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
519 - 525
Database
ISI
SICI code
0959-6836(200007)10:4<519:IOTCRI>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Traps were used to quantify charcoal production and transport during three experimental forest fires in Boreal Scandinavia. The traps were spatially a rranged to collect charcoal particles inside burn areas, and outside burn a reas at different distances (0.1-100 m) from the fire edge. The number of i nside and outside traps was 280 and 424, respectively. Trap area was 48 cm( 2). After the burn, trap content was sorted and sieved in two size-classes of charcoal particles, namely small (0.5-2.0 mm) and large (> 2.0 mm), and number and mass of particles were determined. The production and distributi on of charcoal were highly variable at fine spatial scales inside burn area s. On average, inside traps contained 12.1 small and 10.1 large particles, and the average charcoal mass was 0.112 g per trap (corresponding to 235 kg ha(-1)). The largest size-class made up 94% of the mass. Outside traps con tained 0.3 small and 0.1 large particles per trap, and 45% of the outside p articles were distributed < 1 m from the fire edge. II is concluded that th e occurrence of macroscopic charcoal (greater than or equal to 0.5 mm) in f orest soils provides a solid evidence for local fire influence, and that th e presence of large charcoal particles can be used to distinguish between f ire-prone and fire-free areas with high spatial precision. Absence of large particles must, however, be more carefully interpreted as 14% of the insid e traps lacked macroscopic charcoal. We argue that the charcoal in Boreal f orest soils should be less persistent than previously suggested because doc umented fire-return intervals result in an unrealistic charcoal accumulatio n presupposing high persistence.