In their search for generalizable behavioral patterns and design principles
, cognitive field researchers should reflect on the epistemological limitat
ions of empirical studies. In this paper we describe a framework for episte
mological analysis that can help serve this purpose and discuss its applica
tion to two prototypical cases of cognitive engineering research: laborator
y experiments and field studies. The framework examines two, often implicit
, processes in empirical research: the abstraction from empirical data and
the substantiation of theoretical constructs and principles. By explicitly
considering these two processes in several systematic steps, we can gain ap
preciation for the epistemological contribution of empirical studies to cog
nitive engineering research. The framework and its application also provide
guidance to such important issues as generalizability of results and exter
nal validity. Possible applications of this research include providing guid
ance to researchers and practitioners in evaluating design principles or co
nducting field studies.