In genetic mapping of complex traits, the affected-sib-pair method (ASP) an
d the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) are two methods of choice. The
major appeal of both ASP and TDT is that they do not require the knowledge
of mode of inheritance underlying the trait in question. The relative ease
and economy for data collection also is the reason for their popularity. T
he basic idea of the ASP is to identify genes or chromosomal regions throug
h identifying genetic similarity based on phenotypical similarity. TDT, on
the other hand, detects susceptibility genes through detecting unusual tran
smission patterns in families. Since phenotypic similarity can also be caus
ed by environmental similarity, we investigate how the presence of gene-env
ironment interaction (GEI) affects the power of both methods. For a simple
one locus-one-risk-factor model, our results indicate that, in the presence
of GEI, methods developed based on marginal penetrance functions (i.e, ign
oring the risk factor) can give spurious results. The triangular restrictio
n on allele-sharing probability may no longer be valid. If the environment
effect is strong, using exposure-discordant affected sib pairs may have adv
antage over other designs. Above all, a genetic model involving both geneti
c and environmental factors behaves differently from a single-locus genetic
model. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.