Aim This study compared the radiopacity of tetracalcium phosphate (TTCP) an
d 11 root-end filling materials relative to human dentine.
Methodology Specimens of 2 mm thickness and a graduated aluminium stepwedge
were placed on dental X-ray films and exposed to an X-ray beam. The optica
l densities of the specimens and aluminium steps were measured. The optical
densities of the specimens were correlated to the equivalent thickness of
aluminium with a regression analysis equation. The equation was used to cal
culate the equivalent aluminium thickness of each of the specimens.
Results Nine of the materials were found to be of acceptable radiopacity (a
t least 2 mm Al more radiopaque than dentine). TCCP and two of the glass-io
nomer compounds were found to have insufficient radiopacity to be radiograp
hically distinguishable from human dentine.
Conclusions All the materials were found to be distinguishable radiographic
ally from dentine, except for Vitrebond, TTCP and Ketac-Fil. Amalgam was th
e most radiopaque material and Ketac-Fil was the least radiopaque material
tested.