It. Griffiths et al., Canal shapes produced sequentially during instrumentation with Quantec LX rotary nickel-titanium instruments: a study in simulated canals, INT ENDOD J, 33(4), 2000, pp. 346-354
Aim The aim of this study was to determine the shaping ability of Quantec L
X nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
Methodology Forty simulated canals consisting of four different shapes in t
erms of angle and position of curvature were prepared with Quantec LX instr
uments. Sequential still images were taken of the canals using a video came
ra attached to a computer with image analysis software. Images were taken p
reoperatively; after, instrument 7 (Size 25, 0.05 taper), instrument 8 (siz
e 25, 0.06 taper), and instrument 10 (size 45, 0.02 taper) were taken to le
ngth. Each sequential postoperative image was superimposed individually ove
r the preoperative image in order to highlight the amount and position of m
aterial removed during preparation. Intra-canal impressions after preparati
on to size 10 were taken to evaluate three-dimensional canal form.
Results Overall, the mean preparation time to size 10 was 4.7 min; canal sh
ape did not have a significant effect on speed of preparation. No instrumen
ts fractured within the canal, but 7 instruments separated from the latch g
rip, and a further 3 instruments deformed. All canals remained patent. Foll
owing preparation to size 10, 29 canals (72%) retained their length, 7 (17%
) lost length, and 4 gained length; the magnitude of the change in length w
as always below 1 mm. Zips were created in 3 canals (7%) after use of size
10 instruments, but no perforations or danger zones were produced. Excess r
emoval of material along the outer aspect of the curve between the beginnin
g of the curve and the end-point (outer widening) was found in 22 canals (5
5%) after instrument 7, in 30 (75%) canals after size 8 and in 35 canals (8
8%) after size 10. There was a significant difference (P < 0.0001) between
canal shapes for the incidence of this aberration at all sizes.
Conclusions Under the conditions of the study, Quantec LX instruments tende
d to remove excess material from the outside of the curve between the begin
ning of the curve and the end-point. These aberrations increased in prevale
nce and severity following the use of larger instruments when they were tak
en to length. Size 8, 9 and 10 Quantec LX instruments should be used with c
are and short of length, especially in severely curved canals.