H. Prechel, CORPORATE FORM AND THE STATE - BUSINESS POLICY AND CHANGE FROM THE MULTIDIVISIONAL TO THE MULTILAYERED SUBSIDIARY FORM, Sociological inquiry, 67(2), 1997, pp. 151-174
The largest industrial corporations are changing to a multilayered sub
sidiary form. Whereas corporations have used subsidiaries to organize
their assets since the turn of the century, the number of wholly owned
subsidiaries in the 100 largest industrial corporations doubled betwe
en 1981 and 1993. The question addressed here is: Why are corporations
changing their form now? I suggest that the question is historically
contingent and that the answer is, in parr, explained by changes in st
ate business policy. A capital dependence framework is elaborated to e
xamine the relationship between state business policy and corporations
in the 1970s and 1980s. Business policy changes-resulting in the Tax
Reform Act of 1986 and the Revenue Act of 1987-provided corporations w
ith tax-free procedures for parent companies to simultaneously restruc
ture their divisions as subsidiaries and restructure their debt. There
are additional incentives for corporations to restructure their divis
ions as subsidiaries: (1) creating a liability firewall between the pa
rent company and its subsidiary corporations, limiting the financial r
isk of parent companies, and (2) creating an internal capital market,
providing an alternative form of financing thereby reducing corporatio
ns' dependence on external capital markets.