CORPORATE FORM AND THE STATE - BUSINESS POLICY AND CHANGE FROM THE MULTIDIVISIONAL TO THE MULTILAYERED SUBSIDIARY FORM

Authors
Citation
H. Prechel, CORPORATE FORM AND THE STATE - BUSINESS POLICY AND CHANGE FROM THE MULTIDIVISIONAL TO THE MULTILAYERED SUBSIDIARY FORM, Sociological inquiry, 67(2), 1997, pp. 151-174
Citations number
88
Categorie Soggetti
Sociology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00380245
Volume
67
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
151 - 174
Database
ISI
SICI code
0038-0245(1997)67:2<151:CFATS->2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
The largest industrial corporations are changing to a multilayered sub sidiary form. Whereas corporations have used subsidiaries to organize their assets since the turn of the century, the number of wholly owned subsidiaries in the 100 largest industrial corporations doubled betwe en 1981 and 1993. The question addressed here is: Why are corporations changing their form now? I suggest that the question is historically contingent and that the answer is, in parr, explained by changes in st ate business policy. A capital dependence framework is elaborated to e xamine the relationship between state business policy and corporations in the 1970s and 1980s. Business policy changes-resulting in the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and the Revenue Act of 1987-provided corporations w ith tax-free procedures for parent companies to simultaneously restruc ture their divisions as subsidiaries and restructure their debt. There are additional incentives for corporations to restructure their divis ions as subsidiaries: (1) creating a liability firewall between the pa rent company and its subsidiary corporations, limiting the financial r isk of parent companies, and (2) creating an internal capital market, providing an alternative form of financing thereby reducing corporatio ns' dependence on external capital markets.