Negotiation processes and outcomes in prosocially and egoistically motivated groups

This experiment examined the effects of motivational orientation (prosocial versus egoistic) on interpersonal trust, negotiation behavior, amount of i mpasses, and joint outcomes in three-person negotiations. Students particip ated in a joint venture negotiation, in which motivational orientation was manipulated by allocating individual incentives (egoistic motive) vs. team incentives (prosocial motive). Results indicated that prosocially motivated negotiators achieved more integrative agreements and fewer impasses, and r eported higher trust, more problem solving, and less contending behavior th an egoistically motivated negotiators. Hierarchical regression suggested th at the finding that prosocial groups achieved higher joint outcomes can be explained by higher levels of trust, more problem solving behavior, and les s contending behavior in prosocial groups.