This paper uses the Cash/Benner debate as an example of how important philo
sophical arguments can be hidden due to the use of secondary sources. Nurse
academics can get lost in arguments about the secondary sources when there
is a much more important issue lurking in the background. This paper argue
s that Benner's philosophy is not grounded in Heidegger but Dreyfus's inter
pretation of Heidegger. This has the consequence that Heidegger's ontologic
al difference is collapsed and that her nursing ideas are weakened because
of this. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.