Hunting for Heidegger: questioning the sources in the Benner/Cash debate

Authors
Citation
S. Horrocks, Hunting for Heidegger: questioning the sources in the Benner/Cash debate, INT J NURS, 37(3), 2000, pp. 237-243
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES
ISSN journal
00207489 → ACNP
Volume
37
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
237 - 243
Database
ISI
SICI code
0020-7489(200006)37:3<237:HFHQTS>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
This paper uses the Cash/Benner debate as an example of how important philo sophical arguments can be hidden due to the use of secondary sources. Nurse academics can get lost in arguments about the secondary sources when there is a much more important issue lurking in the background. This paper argue s that Benner's philosophy is not grounded in Heidegger but Dreyfus's inter pretation of Heidegger. This has the consequence that Heidegger's ontologic al difference is collapsed and that her nursing ideas are weakened because of this. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.