R. Caudill et al., Effect of unintentional exposure of 2-stage implants upon subsequent osseointegration: Histologic findings 6 months postloading, INT J PER R, 20(3), 2000, pp. 307-314
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of early spontaneous e
xposure of 2-stage implants upon subsequent histologic bone contact followi
ng occlusal loading. As part of a study comparing 2 types of metallic threa
ded implants, 48 implants (24 CPTi and 24 Ti-13Nb-13Zr) were placed in maxi
llary and mandibular posterior sites in 6 baboons. Implant exposure was eva
luated at time of placement and at each weekly visit for the first 3 weeks,
then at 1, 2, and 3 months, and also at 6 months for the maxilla. Block se
ctions were removed 6 months after the implant restoration was placed into
function. One third (33%) of the maxillary implants became exposed, while 6
6.5% of the mandibular implants became exposed, mostly at 1 to 3 weeks. For
all maxillary implants, fibrous tissue contact in the unintentionally expo
sed group (20.0%) was significantly greater than in the group that remained
submerged (7.7%). Maxillary implants remaining submerged exhibited more si
nus contact. For all mandibular implants, bone contact in the exposed group
(38.9%) was significantly greater than in the submerged group (24.3%). Sim
ilarly, exposed implants exhibited less fibrous tissue contact. All other p
arameters in both maxillary and mandibular arches were statistically simila
r when comparing unintentionally exposed implants to those that remained su
bmerged. This study suggests that accidental exposure of 2-stage implants s
hould result in overall similarities in postloading bone contact to 2-stage
implants that remain submerged during the early postoperative healing peri
od.