PCR assessment of HSV-1 corneal infection in animals treated with rose bengal and lissamine green B

Citation
Wg. Stroop et al., PCR assessment of HSV-1 corneal infection in animals treated with rose bengal and lissamine green B, INV OPHTH V, 41(8), 2000, pp. 2096-2102
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
da verificare
Journal title
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
ISSN journal
01460404 → ACNP
Volume
41
Issue
8
Year of publication
2000
Pages
2096 - 2102
Database
ISI
SICI code
0146-0404(200007)41:8<2096:PAOHCI>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
PURPOSE. In vivo, the ophthalmic dye rose bengal displays profound antivira l effects against herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1, thus limiting its utility i n diagnosis of epithelial keratitis when used before viral culture is perfo rmed. In contrast, lissamine green B does not possess significant antiviral activity in vivo. To determine whether polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cou ld successfully detect HSV-1 DNA in ocular samples that have been exposed t o ophthalmic dyes, animal models were used to observe the presence of infec tious HSV-1 and viral DNA in eyes treated with rose bengal or lissamine gre en B. METHODS. Animals were bilaterally infected with HSV-1 strain H129, and at d aily intervals up to 16 days post infection (dpi) rose bengal or lissamine green B was instilled in the left eyes. The right eyes were not treated wit h dyes. Swabs of the dye-treated and untreated eyes were assayed by PCR for viral infectivity by culture and the presence of DNA specific for a fragme nt of the HSV-1 DNA polymerase gene. RESULTS. A statistically equivalent number of samples from lissamine green B-treated and untreated eyes were positive by both viral culture and PCR. I n contrast, rose bengal significantly decreased the infectious virus presen t in ocular secretions. A total of 44% and 78% of the rose bengal-treated a nd untreated eye samples, respectively, were positive by culture from 1 thr ough 16 dpi. PCR was more sensitive than culture for detection of HSV-1 in rose bengal-treated eyes, in that 74% of rose bengal-treated samples were p ositive by PCR compared with 44% that were positive by culture during the 1 6-day period studied. It was also noted that both rose bengal and lissamine green B treatments slightly prolonged the period during which viral DNA wa s detectable in ocular secretions by PCR, possibly because the singlet oxyg en produced by these photoreactive dyes compromised ocular cellular, humora l, and nonspecific immune factors allowing viral DNA to persist for slightl y longer periods. CONCLUSIONs. PCR can successfully detect HSV-1 DNA in ocular samples that a re culture negative and contain rose bengal or lissamine green B. Visualiza tion of ocular epithelial defects with lissamine green B does not interfere with detection of infectious virus or HSV-1 DNA.