Incidence of atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation in patients with implanted physiological pacemakers

Citation
T. Ishikawa et al., Incidence of atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation in patients with implanted physiological pacemakers, JPN CIRC J, 64(7), 2000, pp. 505-509
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
JAPANESE CIRCULATION JOURNAL-ENGLISH EDITION
ISSN journal
00471828 → ACNP
Volume
64
Issue
7
Year of publication
2000
Pages
505 - 509
Database
ISI
SICI code
0047-1828(200007)64:7<505:IOAFAA>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Atrial flutter (AF) is a troublesome arrhythmia for patients with an implan ted pacemaker. Although it has recently become possible to eliminate AF by radiofrequency catheter ablation (RF-CA), the incidence of AF before and af ter pacemaker implantation has not been clarified. The present study was co nducted with 123 consecutive patients (69.3 +/- 11.6 (SD) years old) implan ted with pacemakers, excluding patients who had chronic atrial fibrillation (AFib) when the pacemaker was implanted; 69 patients with atrioventricular (AV) block and 54 patients with sick sinus syndrome (including 29 patients with bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome). All patients were implanted with p hysiological pacemakers. The follow-up period was 4.7 +/- 1.9 years. In 11 of the 123 patients (8.9%), AF was observed before pacemaker implantation a nd the incidence was significantly higher in patients with sick sinus syndr ome than in those with AV block (16.7 vs 2.9%, p < 0.01). Nine of the 29 pa tients with bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome (31%) had AF. After physiologi cal pacemaker implantation, AF recurred in 9 of the 11 patients, and AF was newly observed in 1 patient. Thus, 10 of the 123 patients (8.1%) had AF af ter physiological pacemaker implantation. Recurrence of AF was not suppress ed by physiological pacing. Thirty of the 123 patients had AFib before impl antation of a pacemaker and its occurrence was reduced by physiological pac ing (from 24.4% to 12.2%, p < 0.05). The incidence of AFib in patients with AF was significantly higher than in those without AF (90.0 vs 5.3%, p < 0. 001). In conclusion, the recurrence of AF is not prevented by physiological pacing and is closely related to the occurrence of AFib. RF-CA should be c onsidered in patients who have AF before pacemaker implantation.