Forty-nine undergraduates observed two cars traveling in the same direction
on a CRT display for various duration. They then chose the car that they b
elieved had run longer, and gave the reason for their choice. There were th
ree types of tasks. Correct judgment was possible for the first type, by lo
gically applying either of two pieces of knowledge about duration: ''durati
on equals temporal end point minus temporal start point" (Knowledge alpha)
or "duration equals distance divided by speed" (Knowledge beta). Knowledge
alpha alone was useful for the second type, while only Knowledge beta led t
o correct judgment for the third. Main results were as follows: (1) Undergr
aduates were more likely to use Knowledge alpha than beta regardless of the
types. (2) None of repeatedly making judgment, thinking about reasons for
judgment, or receiving failure feedback was very helpful making participant
s become aware of necessity of using Knowledge beta for the third type. (3)
Only some 20% of undergraduates were able to use proper knowledge specific
ally required for each type.