Archaeological sediments often offer opportunities to examine local palaeoe
nvironmental conditions from analysis of included microfossils. On-site con
ditions commonly vary, and thus so do the preservation conditions for micro
fossils. Consequently, a range of palynological preparation techniques are
commonly used. While different types of microfossils provide valuable palae
oenvironmental information, the use of separate extraction methods for diff
erent microfossil types may be both time- and resource-consuming, especiall
y where the recovery predictability is low. This paper examines the possibi
lity of combining preparation techniques for three commonly encountered mic
rofossils-pollen, spores and phytoliths-by comparing pollen extractions usi
ng heavy liquid extraction and standard pollen recovery procedures. Althoug
h the use of heavy liquids for pollen and spore preparations has been well-
documented, for several reasons it has not been a favoured technique for po
llen extraction. The research reported here shows that for most of the sedi
ments tested, heavy liquid extraction procedures produced comparable result
s to those arising from standard pollen extraction techniques. For oxidized
sediments, especially, more reliable results are likely to be obtained for
m heavy liquid extraction procedures than from those employing acetolysis.
Overall, heavy liquid procedures allow complementary suites of data to be i
nvestigated with the least cost and effort, thus enabling palynologists and
phytolithologists to adopt more effective research practices for environme
ntal reconstruction. (c) Academic Press