Sj. Fredman et al., Partial response, nonresponse, and relapse with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in major depression: A survey of current "next-step" practices, J CLIN PSY, 61(6), 2000, pp. 403-408
Background: Many patients treated for major depression require more than on
e antidepressant trial to achieve or sustain response However, the literatu
re provides few treatment algorithms or effectiveness studies that empirica
lly support "next-step" options available to clinicians. We conducted a sun
ey of psychiatrists and other medical specialists who treat depression to
ascertain what clinicians actually do when faced with patients who suboptim
ally respond to an adequate course of selective serotonin reuptake inhibito
r (SSRI) therapy.
Method: Attendees at a psychopharmacology course (N = 801) were queried abo
ut their top choices for antidepressant-treatment nonresponders: a minimal
responder after 4 weeks of adequate SSRI treatment, a partial responder aft
er 8 weeks of adequate SSRI therapy, a nonresponder after 8 weeks of adequa
te SSRI therapy, and a relapser on long-term SSRI maintenance therapy, Choi
ces included raising the dose, augmenting or combining with another agent,
switching to a second SSRI, or switching to a non-SSRI agent.
Results: 432 (54%) of the surveys were returned. Raising the dose was the m
ost frequently reported next-step strategy for a patient with minimal respo
nse after if weeks of adequate SSRI therapy, partial response after 8 weeks
of adequate SSRI therapy, and relapse on long-term SSRI therapy. Switching
to a non-SSRI agent was the most frequently chosen option for nonresponder
s to an adequate trial of SSRI therapy.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that clinicians select different next-step
strategies when patients are nonresponders versus when patients are partia
l responders or relapsers.