Defining variables in relationship to other variables: When interactions suddenly turn out to be main effects

Citation
M. Brauer et Cm. Judd, Defining variables in relationship to other variables: When interactions suddenly turn out to be main effects, J EXP S PSY, 36(4), 2000, pp. 410-423
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
ISSN journal
00221031 → ACNP
Volume
36
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
410 - 423
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-1031(200007)36:4<410:DVIRTO>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
It is frequently the case that independent variables in experimental design s in social psychology are defined in relationship to levels of other indep endent variables. For instance, an experimental design in social cognition research might examine the effects of two different expectations on memory for information that is either consistent with the first expectation (and i nconsistent with the second) or consistent with the second expectation. Whe n the information factor is defined in this way, its interaction with expec tation is perfectly confounded with the main effect of the stimulus factor defined in an absolute rather than a relative manner. Because we are traine d to interpret interactions as qualifications of main effects, this alterna tive, and frequently more parsimonious, interpretation may be ignored. We i llustrate the general issue and then review literature where interpretation al ambiguities have resulted. (C) 2000 Academic Press.