Receptor reserve analysis of the human CCR3 receptor in eosinophils and CCR3-transfected cells

Citation
Sp. Umland et al., Receptor reserve analysis of the human CCR3 receptor in eosinophils and CCR3-transfected cells, J LEUK BIOL, 67(3), 2000, pp. 441-447
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Immunology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF LEUKOCYTE BIOLOGY
ISSN journal
07415400 → ACNP
Volume
67
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
441 - 447
Database
ISI
SICI code
0741-5400(200003)67:3<441:RRAOTH>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
A novel pharmacological study of CCR3 receptor reserve in a CCR3-transfecte d cell (CREM3) and human eosinophils was done; functional responses measure d were increases in intracellular calcium and chemotaxis, Eotaxin, eotaxin- 2, monocyte chemoattractant. protein-4 (MCP-4), RANTES, and MCP-S induced s imilar maximal eosinophil chemotaxis, whereas MCP-3 and RANTES induced subm aximal calcium responses in eosinophils compared to eotaxin, MCP-4, and eot axin-2. This suggested a receptor reserve in the chemotaxis response. Recep tor reserve was quantitated for eotaxin, Occupancy of all CCR3 receptors Tv as required for a maximal calcium response in both CREM3 and eosinophils (r eserve 1.0 or 0.17, respectively); the stimulus-calcium response relationsh ip was linear, indicating no receptor reserve. In contrast, in eosinophils a large receptor reserve (6.5) was found for chemotaxis, where occupancy of 15% receptors drove half-maximal responses. These studies indicate that CC R3 interacts with G-proteins that are poorly coupled to the calcium respons e, whereas coupling efficiency and/or amplification to the chemotaxis appar atus in human eosinophils is significantly greater.