QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability

Citation
F. Yoshida et Jg. Topliss, QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability, J MED CHEM, 43(13), 2000, pp. 2575-2585
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry & Analysis
Journal title
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
ISSN journal
00222623 → ACNP
Volume
43
Issue
13
Year of publication
2000
Pages
2575 - 2585
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-2623(20000629)43:13<2575:QMFDHO>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
The quantitative structure-bioavailability relationship of 232 structurally diverse drugs was studied to evaluate the feasibility of constructing a pr edictive model for the human oral bioavailability of prospective new medici nal agents. The oral bioavailability determined in human adults was assigne d one of four ratings and analyzed in relation to physicochemical and struc tural factors by the ORMUCS (ordered multicategorical classification method using the simplex technique) method. A systematic examination of various p hysicochemical parameters relating primarily to absorption, and structural elements which could influence metabolism, was carried out to analyze their effects on the bioavailabilty classification of drugs in the data set. Lip ophilicity, expressed as the distribution coefficient at pH 6.5, was found to be a significant factor influencing bioavailability. The observation tha t acids generally had better bioavailability characterizitics than bases, w ith neutral compounds between, led to the formulation of a new parameter, D elta log D (log D-6.5 - log D-7.4), which proved to be an important contrib utor in improving the classification results. The addition of 15 structural descriptors relating primarily to well-known metabolic processes yielded a satisfactory QSAR equation which had a correct classification rate of 71% (97% within one class) and a Spearman rank correlation coefficient (R-s) of 0.851, despite the diversity of structure and pharmacological activity in the compound set. In leave-one-out tests, an average of 67% of drugs were c orrectly classified (96% within one class) with an R-s of 0.812. The relati onship formulated identified significant factors influencing bioavailabilit y and assigned them quantitative values expressing their contribution. The predictive power of the model was evaluated using a separate test set of 40 compounds, of which 60% (95% within one class) were correctly classified. Since the necessary physicochemical parameters can be calculated or estimat ed and the structural descriptors are obtained from an inspection of the st ructure, the model enables a rough estimate to be made of the prospective h uman oral bioavailability of unsynthesized compounds. Also, the model has t he advantage of transparency in that it indicates which factors may affect bioavailabilty and the extent of that effect. This could be useful in desig ning compounds which are more bioavailable. Refinement of the model is poss ible as more bioavailability data becomes available. Potential uses are in drug design, prioritization of compounds for synthesis, and selection for d etailed studies of early compound leads in drug discovery programs.