P. Burk et Pv. Schleyer, Why are carboxylic acids stronger acids than alcohols? The electrostatic theory of Siggel-Thomas revisited, J MOL ST-TH, 505, 2000, pp. 161-167
The electrostatic explanation of Siggel and Thomas for the acidity differen
ces between series of acids was investigated critically. Acidities and elec
trostatic potentials at the protons of XOH, XNH2, and XCH3 derivatives (X =
H, CH3, HCO, NO2, and Fl were calculated at the Becke3LYP/6-311 +G** level
. Final state (anion) relaxation energies were obtained as proposed by Sigg
el and Thomas. Examination of initial and final state contributions reveale
d deficiencies in the Siggel-Thomas method as the final-state (relaxation)
energies still retain contributions from the electronic structure of the in
itial state. Hence, this relaxation energy is not reliable as a measure of
resonance stabilisation in anion. The application of Siggel-Thomas approach
in two opposite directions-dissociation of neutral acid and protonation of
an anion-leads to contradictory conclusions about whether the acidity diff
erence between methanol and formic acid is determined by the neutral acid o
r anion. Hence, this scheme cannot be used to determine the initial state (
neutral acid) and final state (anion) contributions to acidity as proposed
by Siggel and Thomas. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.